International Service of Process Request: How to Send Your Papers Abroad the Right Way

A trusted, reliable, and affordable resource for attorneys, government agencies, businesses, and individuals who need to serve legal papers in any of 195 countries.

Filing a lawsuit against someone who lives overseas raises a question most people never expect: how do you actually get the papers into their hands? You can’t hop a plane, and you can’t simply drop a summons in the mail and hope for the best. What you need is a properly prepared international service of process request — a formal request for service that follows the rules of a treaty, routes through the right government office, and comes back with proof a U.S. court will accept.

This guide is worth reading because it demystifies that whole submission process. We walk through how a request for service abroad moves under the Hague Service Convention, what the central authorities in each country actually do with your file, who handles requests coming into the United States versus going out, and why the paperwork has to be exactly right the first time. We also answer the everyday questions people search for when a process server shows up — including what happens if you don’t open the door, and whether you can be sued without ever being served.

We are The Global Process Server. Founded by licensed private investigators with more than 30 years in the field, we prepare and transmit service of process requests to foreign central authorities around the world.

Here’s how the system works — and how we make it work for you.

What Is an International Service of Process Request, and When Do You Need One?

An international service of process request is the formal mechanism you use to deliver judicial or extrajudicial documents to a defendant who lives outside of the United States. In plain terms, it’s how you give someone legal notice abroad in a way that holds up back home. If your defendant sits in London, Guadalajara, or Hong Kong, a local process server down the street can’t help you — the delivery has to happen inside that person’s country, under that country’s law.

You need one any time a case reaches across a border. That includes serving a summons and complaint on a foreign resident, delivering divorce or custody papers to a spouse who moved overseas, or notifying a company headquartered in foreign countries that it’s being sued. The moment you have to serve process on someone beyond U.S. soil, an informal approach won’t cut it — you’re now in the world of treaties, government offices, and formal service requests.

Here’s the part that trips people up: getting it wrong is expensive. If your request for service ignores the destination country’s rules, a court can rule the notice invalid — and you’re back to square one, sometimes months later. That’s why the service of process across international lines runs on structure. A well-built request respects the correct method of service, includes any required translation, and lands with the office authorized to act on it. Done right, it turns a daunting cross-border problem into a predictable, provable step.

It also helps to know what a request is not. It isn’t a letter you write and mail yourself, and it isn’t a favor you ask a relative overseas to handle. Formal international process exists precisely so that notice given abroad carries the same legal weight as notice given down the block. The treaties that govern it — chiefly the Hague Service Convention and the Inter-American Convention — set out who may send a request, how it must be formatted, and which office must receive it. When those boxes are checked, your service request becomes something a judge can rely on. When they’re not, it’s just paper.

Who Are We? Meet The Global Process Server

We didn’t start serving papers yesterday. The Global Process Server was built by a leadership team of experienced, licensed private investigators — people who have spent their careers inside courthouses, law offices, and government agencies, at every level of the legal system.

Over three decades, we’ve assembled one of the industry’s most talented groups of professionals. Many of our investigators come from law enforcement backgrounds. They’ve tracked down defendants who did everything possible to vanish, pulled records and electronic data, handled complex litigation and class actions, and managed foreign-state domestication of subpoenas and judgments. Our team is spread across the U.S., linked electronically, and fluent in the rules of all 50 states, U.S. territories, and Indian Reservations — plus the international judicial assistance channels that govern service abroad.

What does that buy you? Fewer failed requests and fewer nasty surprises. International service breaks down in small, avoidable ways — a missing signature, an untranslated form, a packet sent to the wrong office. We’ve seen those failure points before, so we catch them before they cost you time. Attorneys, government entities, and private individuals come to us for the same reasons: dependable results, fair pricing, and people who genuinely know the terrain.

How Does a Request for Service Move Through the Hague Service Convention?

For most member countries, the Hague Service Convention is your road map. Its full name — the Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters — spells out exactly what it covers: delivering judicial and extrajudicial documents for use in civil or commercial matters from one country into another. Drafted under the Hague Conference on Private International Law, it exists to make cross-border notice orderly and predictable.

The core idea is simple. Every country that is a signatory to the treaty agrees to name a Central Authority — an official office whose job is to receive requests for service from other member states. When you need to serve someone in a nation that is a party to the Hague Convention, your request for service abroad is prepared and sent to the appropriate central authority in that country. The designated central authority then arranges delivery under its own local rules.

The flow finishes with proof. Once the foreign officer completes delivery, the appropriate central authority issues a certificate of service confirming when, where, and how service happened — or explaining why it couldn’t be done. That certificate is what tells your court the job is finished. So the lifecycle of a request submitted pursuant to the Hague Service Convention runs in a clean arc: prepare, transmit, execute, and return. Every step matters, because a request sent pursuant to the Hague with a defect can bounce right back to you.

What Do Central Authorities Actually Do With Your Service Request?

It helps to picture the central authorities as the official front doors of each country’s justice system. They’re the only offices formally authorized to accept incoming service requests from abroad and to push them out to the right local officer for delivery. Nothing about the process is casual — this is government-to-government cooperation, built on the treaty’s shared rules.

When we submit on your behalf, the request lands with that nation’s Central Authority, which reviews it for compliance and then arranges for a local court officer or agency to execute it. That’s formal service in action — delivery performed the way the destination country’s law requires, not an improvised drop-off. Many authorities also insist the papers be prepared a specific way: formal requests often must be transmitted in duplicate, on a mandatory form, and translated into the receiving country’s official language before anyone will act on them.

The takeaway is that the method of service isn’t yours to choose freely — it’s shaped by the country receiving your request. One nation may complete service through its courts in a matter of weeks; another may take far longer and demand extra paperwork. Understanding how each Central Authority processes requests for service of documents is the difference between a request that sails through and one that stalls. That institutional knowledge is exactly what we bring to every file.

International Service of Process Request

Who Handles Requests Designated for the United States?

Here’s a detail that surprises even seasoned litigants: the office that handles requests coming into the U.S. is not a government cubicle — it’s a private contractor. Since 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice has delegated the hands-on service work of the U.S. Central Authority to ABC Legal Services. When a foreign court needs to serve a defendant on American soil, the request designated for the United States goes to ABC Legal.

Under that contract, ABC Legal performs the service-related activities of the U.S. Central Authority — handling service on private individuals and companies within the United States for requests sent pursuant to the treaties. It’s the only provider authorized to act on behalf of the U.S. to receive requests for service submitted under the Hague Service Convention, the Inter-American Convention, and letters rogatory arriving through diplomatic channels in civil or commercial matters. In practical terms, only ABC Legal can issue the official certificate of service for formal service completed on the United States under these conventions, and there’s a standard fee — currently $95 — for service on private individuals and companies here.

But — and this is the key point — the United States government hasn’t handed over the whole role. The DOJ’s Office of International Judicial Assistance (OIJA) remains the U.S. Central Authority in every other respect; the contractor simply performs the ministerial delivery function. So when someone abroad wants to serve a party in America, their service on the United States side of the equation runs through ABC Legal. Knowing that split — contractor for delivery, OIJA for everything else — keeps incoming requests from getting misrouted.

Do Outgoing Requests From the U.S. Have to Go Through ABC Legal?

This is where a lot of confusion clears up — and where our clients breathe a sigh of relief. Outgoing requests for service pursuant to the Hague Service Convention do not have to go through the DOJ’s contractor at all. That inbound arrangement only governs service happening inside America.

When you’re serving outward — trying to reach a defendant in another country — the rules flip. Any person or entity competent to forward a request (a court official, an attorney, or another authorized party) may transmit it directly to the foreign country’s Central Authority. In other words, requests sent from the U.S. to a defendant abroad skip the American contractor and go straight to the office that will actually perform the service overseas. The OIJA plays no role in outbound requests either. This is precisely the lane we operate in, and it’s why we can move quickly on your behalf.

That distinction shapes everything about how we handle your matter. Because service requests submitted pursuant to the Convention for outbound delivery don’t require a middleman on the U.S. end, we focus our energy where it counts: preparing a flawless packet, identifying the correct foreign Central Authority, arranging any required translation, and tracking the file until the certificate returns. We manage the parts that actually determine whether your request for service succeeds — not the ones the treaty already streamlines.

There’s a strategic upside here too. Because outbound Hague requests can move directly to the foreign authority, an experienced team can often shave real time off the process by getting the packet right on the first pass. Every rejected or returned request means starting over, and starting over overseas can mean losing months. So the value we add isn’t shuffling papers — it’s knowing precisely what each country’s authority expects, from the wording of the form to the way documents must be signed, so your request clears review instead of bouncing. When we transmit requests sent on your behalf, they go out built to be accepted.

What About the Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory?

Not every case fits neatly under the Hague framework, and in the Americas there’s a second major tool: the Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory, along with its Additional Protocol. This treaty creates its own path for delivering documents among member nations across Central and South America, and it’s a workhorse for U.S. litigants pursuing defendants in the region.

Some countries belong to both systems, which forces a real choice. Mexico is the classic example — a defendant there may be reachable under either the Hague Service Convention and the Inter-American framework, and picking correctly matters. Requests for service pursuant to the Inter-American Convention typically must be translated into Spanish, prepared on the right forms, and routed through the proper office. Choosing between the Service Convention and the Inter-American route — and understanding how each interacts with the destination country’s law — is exactly the kind of judgment that separates a completed serve from a rejected one.

There’s a practical wrinkle worth knowing. Unlike the outbound Hague path, requests pursuant to the Inter-American Convention can flow through the U.S. contractor for both incoming and outgoing requests. That’s a meaningful difference in how the paperwork travels, and it’s easy to mishandle if you don’t do this every day. We keep the Convention and the Inter-American Convention procedures straight so your request goes out on the right track from the start.

What If the Country Isn’t a Signatory? Letters Rogatory and Diplomatic Channels

When a destination country hasn’t signed either convention, service isn’t impossible — it just takes an older, more formal road. The classic fallback is letters rogatory: a formal request from a U.S. court asking a foreign court to carry out the service on its behalf. It’s widely recognized, but it’s slow, because a rogatory request usually travels through diplomatic channels and several layers of government review.

Going the diplomatic route means more moving parts. A letters rogatory package typically passes from the U.S. court through the State Department and into the foreign ministry of the destination country before it ever reaches a local court. Each handoff adds time, and the request must be prepared with real care — this is formal international judicial assistance between sovereign governments, and small errors cause big delays. Because of all that routing, international service by this method can take several months, and sometimes longer for countries with heavy backlogs.

The upside is reach. Even where no treaty exists, letters rogatory and diplomatic cooperation give you a lawful, provable way to serve a defendant in foreign countries that would otherwise be out of bounds. The trick is knowing when to use this path instead of a convention, and how to build the request so a distant court will accept it. That’s a call we make every week, and getting it right saves clients from expensive dead ends.

GLOBAL PROCESS SERVER VIDEOS

Our Core Services: Delivering Results Worldwide

We do more than push paper across borders. We solve the underlying problem — getting the right document into the right hands, provably, wherever that person happens to be. Here’s where we focus.

U.S. Nationwide Process Service

We’re specialists in domestic delivery, having served countless legal documents across all 50 states and U.S. territories since the 1980s. Our network reaches into remote counties most firms won’t touch, and we know the local rules that decide whether a serve holds up. Every job comes back with a court-ready proof of service — clean, accurate, and beyond reproach. When your defendant is stateside but hard to reach, we’re the crew that closes the file.

International Service of Process in 195 Nations

This is our signature strength. We prepare and transmit your request for service to the correct foreign Central Authority, whether the case runs under the Hague Service Convention, the Inter-American Convention, or traditional letters rogatory. We handle the translation, choose the delivery method the destination country actually accepts, and track the file until the certificate of service comes back. From Western Europe to the far corners of Asia, we manage the logistics so you can stay focused on the case itself.

International and Domestic Private Investigations

Sometimes the hardest part isn’t the treaty — it’s finding the person. Our certified investigators, many of them former law enforcement, deliver skip tracing, asset searches, background checks, and surveillance on both sides of the border. We combine old-fashioned investigative grit with modern databases to locate defendants who are actively dodging notice, and we do it without ever trespassing on private property. When someone thinks they’ve disappeared, we’re the reason they haven’t.

How Long Does an International Service Request Take, and What Does It Cost?

Let’s be honest about timelines, because unrealistic expectations cause more stress than the process itself. A domestic serve can wrap up in days. An international one is a different animal: because your request for service has to reach a foreign Central Authority, get executed by a local officer, and travel back as a certificate of service, service can take anywhere from a couple of months to well over a year, depending on the country.

Cost follows a similar logic. Beyond our service fee, some destinations charge their own government fee — the standard charge for inbound U.S. service, for instance, is $95 — and Spanish-speaking countries will require documents translated into Spanish before anything moves. Certain forms must be signed in specific ways, and a missing signature or an incomplete translation is one of the most common reasons a request gets kicked back. Building the packet correctly the first time is the single biggest thing you can do to keep the clock from resetting.

Our advice is always the same: start early and plan for the slowest realistic timeline, not the best case. We’ll tell you up front roughly how long a given country tends to take, what it will cost, and what could speed things up or slow them down. No guessing games — just a clear picture so your international service request fits neatly into your case schedule instead of blowing it up.

What Real Clients Say

We’ll let our work speak, but our clients say it better.

“We really appreciated the effort you made to find and serve the defendant — you were able to find the correct address when we had an old one.” — Gretchen, Law Offices of Stanley H. Roehrig

“The cost-to-value ratio would make it financially irresponsible to use anyone else.” — Aaron Cushman, COO at Andrew, Palma, Lavin & Solis, PLLC

“Within a couple of days the entire process was served and done. Their service was a huge relief for me!” — Cynthia B., Pro Se Individual

Across law firms, corporate legal departments, and individuals handling their own matters, the pattern holds: we find people others can’t, we prepare requests that get accepted, and we do it at a price that makes sense.

Can You Refuse to Be Served by a Process Server?

What “Refusing” Actually Accomplishes (Hint: Not Much)

You can decline to take the papers from a server’s hand, but that refusal carries far less weight than most people believe. In many jurisdictions, once a process server has correctly identified you and set the documents down within your reach — or even dropped them at your feet after you refuse — service is legally considered complete. You cannot cancel a lawsuit by pushing paper away.

Refusal also tends to invite the very procedures people are trying to avoid. Persistent stonewalling can justify substituted service or service by publication, and in cross-border cases it can push a matter into slower channels like letters rogatory — which only prolongs your exposure. The healthier move is to accept the document, note the date, and speak with an attorney about your response window. Refusing changes the mood of the encounter; it almost never changes the outcome of the proceeding.

How to Tell if a Process Server Is Real?

Simple Ways to Verify Before You Open the Door

Because scammers occasionally pose as servers to extract money or personal information, it’s fair to verify. A legitimate process server delivers documents — they never collect payment, demand a Social Security number, or threaten immediate arrest on the spot. If someone asks for a fee or a “settlement” at your door, that’s a red flag, not a serve.

To confirm the real thing, ask which court and case the papers relate to; a genuine server can point you to a case number you can look up with the court clerk. In states that license servers, you can ask for identification or registration details. And remember what a real serve looks like: the person is simply there to hand over a judicial document and, in international matters, may be acting on a request that originated through a Central Authority or judicial assistance channel. When in doubt, take the papers, then verify the case with the clerk of the court directly.

What Happens if a Server Can’t Find You?

The Investigative Playbook for Elusive Defendants

When a defendant seems to have vanished, the case doesn’t end — the search intensifies. We turn to skip tracing, running professional databases and public records to develop a current address, employer, or pattern of movement. A large share of “impossible” serves are really just outdated address problems, and locating people is one of our core strengths as former investigators.

If someone truly cannot be found after diligent, documented effort, the law provides a path anyway. In California, for example, a court can authorize service by publication under the state’s civil procedure rules, treating a notice printed in a court-approved newspaper as valid. In international matters, an inability to complete formal service may route the case into letters rogatory or trigger alternative provisions the court approves. Either way, disappearing is not a permanent shield — it usually just changes the method the law uses to reach you.

Is It Safe to Be a Process Server?

The Real Risks of the Job and How Professionals Manage Them

For the most part, yes — but it isn’t a desk job, and experienced servers respect the risks. Not everyone is happy to be served, and encounters can occasionally turn tense. That’s why seasoned professionals train for it: they read a property before approaching, park for an easy exit, stay observant, and keep interactions brief and calm.

The bigger day-to-day hazards are surprisingly ordinary — long solo drives, unfamiliar rural roads, loose dogs, and the sheer mileage the work demands. Good servers manage safety with preparation and situational awareness rather than confrontation. On the international side, the “risk” shifts from physical to procedural: the challenge becomes navigating a foreign country’s internal law, its Central Authority, and its rules for accepting a judicial or extrajudicial document. In both settings, professionalism and preparation are what keep the work safe and the results clean.

Can a Process Server Just Leave Papers at Your Door?

When Drop Service and Substituted Service Are — and Aren’t — Allowed

Not always, and the rules matter. Many documents require personal service, meaning the papers must reach the named individual directly — a housemate or co-worker generally can’t accept on their behalf. In those cases, a server can’t simply leave a packet on the mat and consider the job done.

That said, the law does allow alternatives once personal delivery proves impractical. Substituted service typically permits leaving documents with a responsible adult at the home or workplace and then mailing a copy, with service deemed complete a set number of days later. If you refuse to take papers a server is authorized to deliver personally, dropping them at your feet can count as valid service of process in some jurisdictions. And in cross-border matters, whether a document can be left at all depends on the destination country’s rules and the channel used — which is exactly why the correct procedure, executed by an appropriate agency, is never something to improvise.

What Happens if I Don’t Answer the Door for a Process Server?

Why Ignoring the Knock Rarely Helps and Usually Hurts

Not answering the door won’t make a lawsuit vanish — it usually just makes everything slower and more stressful. A process server can’t break the law or trespass, but a good one is patient and persistent. If you don’t answer, they may lawfully wait nearby and catch you coming or going, or return at different times of day.

More importantly, avoidance rarely stops a case. When personal delivery is repeatedly dodged, courts often allow substituted service — leaving the papers with a responsible adult and mailing a copy — or, as a last resort, service by publication. In a cross-border matter, a foreign Central Authority can complete formal service under its own law whether you cooperate or not. The service of process moves forward regardless. Opening the door simply gives you a head start on responding.

Why Would a Process Server Be Looking for Me?

The Ordinary Reasons a Professional Ends Up at Your Door

If a process server is trying to reach you, it’s almost always because someone needs to give you official, court-recognized notice of a legal matter. That’s the entire job — delivering formal notice so a case can proceed. It is not an accusation, and it doesn’t mean you’ve done anything wrong.

The reasons vary. It could be a lawsuit, a subpoena, a divorce or custody filing, an eviction, a small-claims dispute, or a debt matter. In an international case, a server may be acting on a request for service that originated overseas and was routed through a Central Authority or letters rogatory. Whatever the cause, being sought out simply means the law now requires you to be part of a legal process — and the sooner you understand what’s coming, the better you can protect your own interests.

Can You Refuse to Be Served by a Process Server?

What “Refusing” Really Accomplishes (Not Much)

You can decline to physically take the papers, but that refusal carries far less weight than people think. In many places, once a server has correctly identified you and set the documents within your reach — even at your feet after you refuse — service is legally considered complete. You cannot cancel a lawsuit by pushing paper away.

Refusal also tends to trigger the very outcomes people are trying to dodge. Stonewalling can justify substituted service or service by publication, and in international matters it can push a case into slower diplomatic channels or rogatory routes that only prolong your exposure. The smarter move is to accept the document, note the date, and talk to an attorney about your deadline. Refusing changes the mood of the moment; it almost never changes the result.

Can a Process Server Walk Around Your House?

Where the Line Sits Between Diligence and Trespass

A process server is allowed to do a reasonable amount to reach you — walk up your driveway, knock at your front door, and approach entrances a visitor would normally use. Courts expect servers to make a genuine, diligent effort, so stepping onto the accessible parts of a property to attempt delivery is generally fair game.

What they can’t do is trespass into clearly private areas — hopping a locked gate, entering a closed backyard, or forcing their way into a home. The rules vary by state, but the principle is consistent: a server may go where an ordinary caller could go, and no further. Reputable professionals stay firmly on the legal side of that line, both to protect your rights and to make sure the service they complete actually stands up in court.

Can a Process Server Just Leave Papers at Your Door?

When Drop Service and Substituted Service Are — and Aren’t — Allowed

Not always, and the details matter. Many documents require personal delivery, meaning the papers must reach the named individual directly — a housemate or co-worker usually can’t accept for them. In those cases, a server can’t simply leave a packet on the mat and call it done.

That said, the law does provide alternatives once personal delivery proves impractical. Substituted service typically allows leaving the documents with a responsible adult at the home or workplace and then mailing a copy, with service deemed complete a set number of days later. If you refuse papers a server is authorized to hand you personally, dropping them at your feet can count as valid delivery in some states. And in an international case, whether papers can be left at all depends on the destination country’s rules and the method of service its Central Authority uses — which is why the correct procedure is never something to improvise.

How Many Attempts Will a Process Server Make in Texas?

Defining Diligence in the Lone Star State

In Texas, there’s no single magic number carved into stone, but the practical standard is diligence — a server is expected to make several good-faith attempts before a court will consider alternative methods. In practice, that usually means around three attempts, made at different times and on different days to maximize the odds of catching the person home.

If those attempts fail, the case doesn’t stall out. The server documents each try in a sworn affidavit, and the party can ask the court for permission to use substituted service — such as leaving the papers with someone at the residence or, in some situations, serving by other court-approved means. That record of diligent effort is what persuades a Texas judge that reasonable steps were taken. The same principle scales up internationally: foreign central authorities and letters rogatory requests likewise expect a documented, good-faith effort before service is deemed complete.

Can a Process Server Harass You?

Knowing the Difference Between Persistence and Harassment

No. A process server is allowed to be persistent, but not abusive. Legitimate persistence looks like repeated visits, waiting near a home or workplace, and following up at reasonable hours. What crosses the line is threatening you, impersonating law enforcement, showing up in the middle of the night to intimidate, or contacting you in ways designed to harass rather than to deliver papers.

If a server behaves that way, you have options — you can document the conduct, report it to the court or the agency that hired them, and in serious cases raise it with local authorities. A professional never needs to resort to harassment, because the law already provides lawful tools to complete difficult serves. At our firm, we get results through skill and diligence, not intimidation, and every serve we complete is designed to be clean, lawful, and defensible.

Can You Be Sued Without Being Served?

Why Notice Is a Constitutional Requirement, Not a Formality

A lawsuit can be filed against you without your knowledge, but it generally cannot proceed to judgment until you’ve been properly served — that’s a core due-process protection. The whole point of service of process is to guarantee you get notice and a chance to respond before a court can rule against you. Skipping it isn’t a shortcut; it’s a fatal flaw a defendant can later use to unwind the case.

There are narrow exceptions. When a defendant truly can’t be located after diligent effort, a court may authorize alternative notice, such as service by publication. And a judgment entered without valid service can often be challenged and set aside precisely because notice was defective. This is exactly why proper service — domestic or through an international request for service — is so important: it’s the step that makes everything after it legitimate. Cut this corner, and the entire case is built on sand.

Ready to File Your International Service of Process Request? Get a Free Consultation

Whether you need a straightforward local serve or a complex request for service abroad routed through a foreign Central Authority, we’re ready to help you cut through the red tape. With more than 30 years of investigative and legal experience behind us, we treat every request as if your case depends on it — because it does.

A few things to keep in mind before you call:

Prepare the request correctly the first time. A missing signature, an untranslated form, or the wrong office can send your service request right back and cost you months.
Match the treaty to the country. The Hague Service Convention, the Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory, and traditional letters rogatory each have their place — and only one is right for any given defendant.
Plan for the timeline. International service can take several months, so starting early keeps a distant defendant from dictating your calendar.

FREE CONSULTATION — Get a Free Quote. 📞 Call now: 855-505-9155 🌐 TheGlobalProcessServer.com

Leverage three decades of expertise for your case today. We find them. We serve them. We prove it.

Key Takeaways to Remember

An international service of process request is how you deliver judicial or extrajudicial documents to a defendant outside of the United States in a way your court will accept.
Under the Hague Service Convention, your request for service goes to the destination country’s designated central authority, which arranges delivery and returns a certificate of service.
Outgoing requests from the U.S. can be transmitted directly to the foreign Central Authority — they do not have to go through the DOJ’s contractor. Only incoming requests designated for the United States run through ABC Legal, while OIJA remains the U.S. Central Authority in all other respects.
The Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory (with its Additional Protocol) is the go-to for much of Latin America, often requires documents translated into Spanish, and can handle both incoming and outgoing requests.
When a country isn’t a signatory to any convention, letters rogatory through diplomatic channels provide a lawful fallback — but expect it to take several months.
Proper service is a constitutional must. Skip it, and a judgment can be challenged and thrown out — which is exactly why professional handling is worth it.

Since 1986, The Global Process Server has provided high quality, professional and affordable legal support for law firms and attorneys in all 50 states, local, state, and federal U.S. government agencies, and businesses throughout the country. Our talented, experienced team serves legal documents with guaranteed, immediate service for all case types anywhere nationwide. We understand local and state regulations for all 50 states and can help ensure you get an enforceable judgment as soon as possible.

Bank Levies
Court Filing
Cross Complaints
Record Subpoenas
Wage Garnishments
Writs of Execution
Personal Subpoenas

The Global Process Server has provided fast, professional and affordable legal support to businesses and individuals on every continent for more than three decades. We serve legal documents of all types to 195 countries around the world according to Hague Service Convention, Letters Rogatory, Inter-American Treaty, as well as any other national or international requirements.

Click any nation below for more information about international process service.

The Hague Convention on the Service of Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters is designed to simplify the process of servicing process to assure that defendants sued in foreign jurisdictions receive actual and timely notice of suit and to facilitate proper proof of service. For more information on the Page Convention please visit the following resources:

Please read our Terms of Service by clicking here.

Our international locations do NOT receive mail,
direct inquiries, or courier deliveries.
Please contact our main California office with all correspondence below:

Dial 855-505-9155 to speak with a representative.

Live chat is available at the lower right hand corner button.